|
The primary concern of the railroad signaling industry, the one that occupies many of our thoughts and energies, is that of safety. Providing for the safe operation of trains is our paramount responsibility and in railroading seemingly innocuous issues can suddenly and irreversibly be revealed in events that range from threatening to catastrophic. The issue of safety is not just a facet of the industry, it is the industry.
It is this characteristic which separates railroad automation from industrial automation - at least the vast majority of industrial automation. Most factory automation engineers may have to respond to a threat of limited property damage and some health threat to workers in the immediate area of controlled equipment - very few have to calculate the potential for catastrophic events. Notice that I said very few - I did not say none.
There exists an ever-increasing segment of the industrial automation industry that is primarily concerned with safety-relevant control. The applications are varied but many of them are comparable to the risk profiles encountered in railroading given the potential for catastrophic events. Chemical processing, radioactive material handling, and metallurgical production were the obvious instigators of this development, but the definition of safety relevant processes is becoming increasingly common as European factories continue to expand their definitions of what requires safety-critical control. The increasingly regulated nature of the EU may be one reason for this expansion, however the ability to apply safety-certified products economically (due to newly available safety PLCs) is certainly also playing a role.
|
|
|