![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Functionality Using Personal Computer technology as a logic controller |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PCs as replacement for PLCs was thought to bring cost savings and other advantages. Result has actually been the appearance of PC functionality in PLCs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| One of the emerging trends in the last 5 years in industrial automation is the talk of replacement of specialized PLC systems with PC-based (personal computer) for automation control. This market development is driven primarily by the continuing reduction in PC hardware prices and their continuing increase in computing power. Another motivating factor of PC usage is the perceived ease of integration and networking of PCs and their user-friendly interface. The result on the automation industry has actually been the flip side of the original motivation, instead of using PCs (although they are being used and one automation supplier specializes in this supply) the primary affect has been the appearance of PC-type functionality in the PLCs. PLCs are now capable of integration into business networks, web hosting, ethernet communication, multiple language programming, etc. This has even motivated some suppliers to try to change the name PLC to something more indicitave of the hybrid-type products currently available. The use of PLCs largely remains the status quo because although the attractiveness of PC-based control is increasingly feasible, it is largely not yet as reliable or cost effective as PLC control for most automation tasks (one of the primary challenge iss the processing nature of PCs compared to the sequential looping of PLC execution and the related CPU loads). Acordingly most automation tasks require an industrial PC workstation and highly specialized programming which tends to offset the original intention of cost saving via standard COTS hardware and software. That being said, the line between PLC and PC is increasingly fuzzy and it is clear that the future of automation control will continue to demand PC-type functionality of control equipment regardless of Lessons for Railroaders: 1. Much of the talk about PC-based control has resulted more in the appearance of PC-type functionality in control equipment that actual PC equipment in control environments. The distinction between control equipment and personal computing continues to disappear. Suppliers proposing PC-based control systems should be thoroughly scrutinized regarding system reliability and resultant cost advantages. 2. True PC control may be coming but it remains something that is probably several years away. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| back to Functionality |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| back to Contents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||