![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background What do railroad and industrial automation have in common? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actually quite a bit. If you think about it a railroad is actually a factory. One great big long factory! The functions of a railroad, namely the transport of cars full of goods and people, is little different from that of other process industries in terms of defined process steps, rules regarding operations and the repeated automation of system responses to changing conditions. Both railroads and factory automation systems have the primary economic goal of safely utilizing their fixed assets (machines, mixers, conveyors for manufacturers; locomotives, cars, and track for railroads) to their maximum capabilities in order to maximize production (whether number of widgets or ton-miles per operating dollar). In other words efficiency, efficiency, efficiency. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| There are factories in the world producing a car every 30 seconds, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Then how do these systems differ? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The answer is - extensively! Simply considering the logistical challenge railroads have in maintaining a "production line" distributed over thousands of miles of geographical territory it is clear that any simple comparison of manufacturing and processing automation to that of a railroad is overly simplistic, never mind the differences in the types of equipment they are controlling. Railroad automation differs from factories in some other important ways as well. The most important of these are the areas of safety and environment. Although certain factory automation tasks have safety requirements at least as high as the safety requirements of railroads (imagine automating a process involving bulk quantities of hazardous chemicals or perhaps nuclear materials) the vast majority of factories operate under less stringent mandates than railroads which have the potential for death and catastrophic circumstances in almost every daily operation they perform. In contrast to factories railroads also tend to be outside! In terms of automation equipment this results in some very specific requirements which generally do not exist in factories. As we will see, however, some factory automation environments can actually have conditions equal to or even exceeding the severity required by railroads (think of a the heat of a steel processing plant or the corrosiveness of chemical manufacturing). Railroad automation and factory automation also tend to be different in terms of functionality, applicable norms and standards, and the measurement of fixed asset performance as a contributing factor to overall efficiency - one area where railroads could learn quite a bit from the automation industry. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| How do they achieve this productivity? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| So what is there to learn? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The railroad industry, while undoubtedly specialized, is not as different from other automation industries as it may think. Some of the primary challenges facing railroads in the automation of asset operations (for example, interlockings and grade crossing controllers) parallel similar challenges facing other industries that are operating on a much larger scale in terms of number and frequency of processing cycle and controlled equipment ( the PLC market is a $5 billion/year market). By understanding how these companies are responding to their challenges, railroads can better formulate their own strategies for migrating towards higher efficiency. Given the projected increase in railroad traffic over the next 20 years of up to 70% and the resulting efficiency demand on assets, such strategies are sure to gain in importance for railroads. Given the fact that railroads tend to be a highly specialized and therefore somewhat isolated industry it is also important for railroads to stay up to date on the technical advances in the automation world. Although historically a pioneer in the practical use of many new technologies (telegraph, telephone, radio communiciations) the railroad industry has fallen behind in several keyareas in recent years as economic pressure on the manufacturing and processing industries (often in the form of relocation to lower wage countries-not exactly feasible with a railroad!) has driven technological innovations at an ever-increasing rate. It is beneficial for railroaderss to stay informed regarding these advances as we can then better judge the modernity of our own equipment and suppliers as well as to help shape the direction of technological advances in our own industry. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| What can we learn from them? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| to Performance & Performance Measurement |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| back to Contents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| interlock, interlocking, signal interlocking, railroad interlocking, intrlocking, rail interlocking, railroad automation, factory automation, programmable logic controller, plc, ssi, interlocking, arema, aar, signaling, railroad signaling, vital processor, wayside signaling, wayside, relay logic, relay, microlok, vhlc, geo, networking, data reporting, vpi, vhlc, geo, microlock, microlok |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||